Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:58
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How far back into your childhood can your remember and what is your favorite memory of that time?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sex advice: I'm finally ready to enter my promiscuity era. But there's a catch. - Slate Magazine
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
NASA Discovers That Venus’ Surface Is Still Alive: New Evidence of Active Geology - The Daily Galaxy
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why should the law care about what I do behind closed doors?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Wicked: For Good trailer transports fans back to Oz - BBC
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
WhatsApp backs Apple in its legal row with the UK over user data - BBC
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.